Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Performance of ChatGPT in Dentistry: Multi-specialty and multi-centric study
7
Zitationen
31
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
<title>Abstract</title> Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered tools have transformed the field of healthcare. A recently launched large language model, ChatGPT has gained significant traction due to its communicative interface and relevance of the responses generated. This tool could be utilized in dentistry for dental education, and possibly as a clinical decision support system. Hence, it is imperative to evaluate the accuracy of the model in relation to the responses generated for dental-related queries. Methods: This multi-centric study involved 27 subject experts from nine dental specialties of various institutions and 2 heads of institutions. A total of 243 questions were formulated and the answers generated by ChatGPT (version: 3.5) were rated in terms of accuracy (6-point Likert), completeness (4-point Likert), and relevance (5-point Likert). Results: The mean accuracy of the ChatGPT-generated answers was 4.61 (SD 1.575), with a median of 5.33. For completeness, mean score was 2.01 (SD 0.793), and the median was 2.33. Regarding relevance, a mean of 3.13 (SD 1.590) and median of 3.67 were obtained. The highest ratings were observed for answers related to Oral Medicine and Radiology, as well as for open-ended questions, and questions labelled as easy in terms of difficulty. Conclusion: The promising results observed in the study promote the application of ChatGPT for retrieving dental information. However, it is crucial to exercise caution and seek advice from a qualified healthcare for dental health-related queries. Further large-scale testing of the model is necessary before incorporating it into dental clinical practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.102 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.468 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.
Autoren
- Deborah Sybil
- Priyanshu Kumar Shrivastava
- Arpita Rai
- Ranjit J. Injety
- Sanjay Singh
- Ashish Jain
- Amit Vasant Mahuli
- Anita Parushetti
- Anka Sharma
- Arvind Sivakumar
- Bindiya Narang
- Farheen Sultan
- Gaurav Shah
- Gokul Sridha
- Jeyaseelan Augustine
- Madhu Ranjan
- Neelam Singh
- Nishant Mehta
- Nishat Sultan
- Panchali Batra
- Sangita Singh
- Sapna Goel
- Sayani Roy
- Shabina Sachdeva
- Sharmila Tapashetti
- Simpy Mahuli
- Sridhar Kannan
- Sugandha Verma
- Tushar Tushar
- Vijay Yadav
- Vivek Gupta