Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparative performance analysis of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0 and Bard in answering common patient questions on melanoma
5
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0, and Google's Bard in answering patient questions on melanoma. Results show that both versions of ChatGPT outperform Bard, particularly in readability, with no significant difference between the two ChatGPT versions. The study underscores the potential of large language models in healthcare, highlighting the need for professional oversight and further research.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.231 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.084 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.444 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.423 Zit.