Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study
48
Zitationen
13
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Using ChatGPT to generate a scientific abstract may not lead to issues of similarity when using real full texts written by humans. However, the quality of the ChatGPT-generated abstracts was suboptimal, and their accuracy was not 100%.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.214 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.071 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.429 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.418 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Mackay Medical College(TW)
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University(TW)
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital(TW)
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University(TW)
- Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital(TW)
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital(TW)
- Kaohsiung Medical University(TW)
- Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(TW)
- Tri-Service General Hospital(TW)
- National Defense Medical Center(TW)
- National Taiwan University(TW)
- National Taiwan University Hospital(TW)
- Tri-Service General Hospital Beitou Branch(TW)
- Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital(TW)
- Asia University(TW)
- National Sun Yat-sen University(TW)
- I-Shou University(TW)
- E-Da Hospital(TW)
- China Medical University Hospital(TW)
- China Medical University(TW)
- An-Nan Hospital(TW)