Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Data sharing and big data in health professions education: Ottawa consensus statement and recommendations for scholarship
11
Zitationen
14
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Changes in digital technology, increasing volume of data collection, and advances in methods have the potential to unleash the value of big data generated through the education of health professionals. Coupled with this potential are legitimate concerns about how data can be used or misused in ways that limit autonomy, equity, or harm stakeholders. This consensus statement is intended to address these issues by foregrounding the ethical imperatives for engaging with big data as well as the potential risks and challenges. Recognizing the wide and ever evolving scope of big data scholarship, we focus on foundational issues for framing and engaging in research. We ground our recommendations in the context of big data created through data sharing across and within the stages of the continuum of the education and training of health professionals. Ultimately, the goal of this statement is to support a culture of trust and quality for big data research to deliver on its promises for health professions education (HPE) and the health of society. Based on expert consensus and review of the literature, we report 19 recommendations in (1) framing scholarship and research through research, (2) considering unique ethical practices, (3) governance of data sharing collaborations that engage stakeholders, (4) data sharing processes best practices, (5) the importance of knowledge translation, and (6) advancing the quality of scholarship through multidisciplinary collaboration. The recommendations were modified and refined based on feedback from the 2022 Ottawa Conference attendees and subsequent public engagement. Adoption of these recommendations can help HPE scholars share data ethically and engage in high impact big data scholarship, which in turn can help the field meet the ultimate goal: high-quality education that leads to high-quality healthcare.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2011 · 33.471 Zit.
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
2020 · 18.366 Zit.
To Err Is Human
2000 · 14.067 Zit.
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
2007 · 9.440 Zit.
KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease
2024 · 6.687 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University of Toronto(CA)
- The Wilson Centre(CA)
- McMaster University(CA)
- Maastricht University(NL)
- Queen's University(CA)
- Education Development Center(US)
- China Medical University Hospital(TW)
- China Medical University(TW)
- Education University of Hong Kong(HK)
- University of Aberdeen(GB)
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education(US)
- Harvard University(US)
- University of Cincinnati(US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center(US)
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation(DK)
- University of Copenhagen(DK)
- National Taiwan Normal University(TW)
- Laurentian University(CA)
- Ottawa Hospital(CA)
- University of Ottawa(CA)