Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Geometric Loci and ChatGPT: Caveat Emptor!
8
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
We compare the performance of two systems, ChatGPT 3.5 and GeoGebra 5, in a restricted, but quite relevant, benchmark from the realm of classical geometry: the determination of geometric loci, focusing, in particular, on the computation of envelopes of families of plane curves. In order to study the loci calculation abilities of ChatGPT, we begin by entering an informal description of a geometric construction involving a locus or an envelope and then we ask ChatGPT to compute its equation. The chatbot fails in most situations, showing that it is not mature enough to deal with the subject. Then, the same constructions are also approached through the automated reasoning tools implemented in the dynamic geometry program, GeoGebra Discovery, which successfully resolves most of them. Furthermore, although ChatGPT is able to write general computer code, it cannot currently output that of GeoGebra. Thus, we consider describing a simple method for ChatGPT to generate GeoGebra constructions. Finally, in case GeoGebra fails, or gives an incorrect solution, we refer to the need for improved computer algebra algorithms to solve the loci/envelope constructions. Other than exhibiting the current problematic performance of the involved programs in this geometric context, our comparison aims to show the relevance and benefits of analyzing the interaction between them.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.