Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT’s Response Consistency: A Study on Repeated Queries of Medical Examination Questions
43
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
(1) Background: As the field of artificial intelligence (AI) evolves, tools like ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into various domains of medicine, including medical education and research. Given the critical nature of medicine, it is of paramount importance that AI tools offer a high degree of reliability in the information they provide. (2) Methods: A total of <i>n</i> = 450 medical examination questions were manually entered into ChatGPT thrice, each for ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4. The responses were collected, and their accuracy and consistency were statistically analyzed throughout the series of entries. (3) Results: ChatGPT 4 displayed a statistically significantly improved accuracy with 85.7% compared to that of 57.7% of ChatGPT 3.5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, ChatGPT 4 was more consistent, correctly answering 77.8% across all rounds, a significant increase from the 44.9% observed from ChatGPT 3.5 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The findings underscore the increased accuracy and dependability of ChatGPT 4 in the context of medical education and potential clinical decision making. Nonetheless, the research emphasizes the indispensable nature of human-delivered healthcare and the vital role of continuous assessment in leveraging AI in medicine.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.197 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.047 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.410 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.410 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena(DE)
- Technical University of Munich(DE)
- Klinikum rechts der Isar(DE)
- Harvard University(US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital(US)
- Queen Mary University of London(GB)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam(NL)
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital(CN)
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro(BR)
- Instituto Ivo Pitanguy(BR)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München(DE)