Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
AI assisted reader evaluation in acute CT head interpretation (AI-REACT): protocol for a multireader multicase study
6
Zitationen
24
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A non-contrast CT head scan (NCCTH) is the most common cross-sectional imaging investigation requested in the emergency department. Advances in computer vision have led to development of several artificial intelligence (AI) tools to detect abnormalities on NCCTH. These tools are intended to provide clinical decision support for clinicians, rather than stand-alone diagnostic devices. However, validation studies mostly compare AI performance against radiologists, and there is relative paucity of evidence on the impact of AI assistance on other healthcare staff who review NCCTH in their daily clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A retrospective data set of 150 NCCTH will be compiled, to include 60 control cases and 90 cases with intracranial haemorrhage, hypodensities suggestive of infarct, midline shift, mass effect or skull fracture. The intracranial haemorrhage cases will be subclassified into extradural, subdural, subarachnoid, intraparenchymal and intraventricular. 30 readers will be recruited across four National Health Service (NHS) trusts including 10 general radiologists, 15 emergency medicine clinicians and 5 CT radiographers of varying experience. Readers will interpret each scan first without, then with, the assistance of the qER EU 2.0 AI tool, with an intervening 2-week washout period. Using a panel of neuroradiologists as ground truth, the stand-alone performance of qER will be assessed, and its impact on the readers' performance will be analysed as change in accuracy (area under the curve), median review time per scan and self-reported diagnostic confidence. Subgroup analyses will be performed by reader professional group, reader seniority, pathological finding, and neuroradiologist-rated difficulty. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the UK Healthcare Research Authority (IRAS 310995, approved 13 December 2022). The use of anonymised retrospective NCCTH has been authorised by Oxford University Hospitals. The results will be presented at relevant conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06018545.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.553 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.444 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.943 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.792 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Autoren
- Howell Fu
- Alex Novak
- Dennis Robert
- Shamie Kumar
- Swetha Tanamala
- Jason Oke
- Kanika Bhatia
- Ruchir Shah
- Andrea Romsauerova
- Tilak Das
- Abdalá Espinosa
- Mariusz Grzeda
- Mariapaola Narbone
- Rahul Dharmadhikari
- Mark Harrison
- Kavitha Vimalesvaran
- Jane Gooch
- Nicholas Woznitza
- Nabeeha Salik
- Alan Campbell
- Farhaan Khan
- David J. Lowe
- Haris Shuaib
- Sarim Ather
Institutionen
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust(GB)
- Qarshi University(PK)
- University of Oxford(GB)
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- King's College London(GB)
- King's College School(GB)
- St Thomas' Hospital(GB)
- St. Thomas Hospital(CA)
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital(GB)
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- University of Derby(GB)
- Canterbury Christ Church University(GB)
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- University Radiology(US)
- University College London(GB)
- Science Oxford(GB)
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde(GB)