Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can ChatGPT pass the MRCP (UK) written examinations? Analysis of performance and errors using a clinical decision-reasoning framework
44
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are being developed for use in research, medical education and clinical decision systems. However, as their usage increases, LLMs face ongoing regulatory concerns. This study aims to analyse ChatGPT's performance on a postgraduate examination to identify areas of strength and weakness, which may provide further insight into their role in healthcare. DESIGN: We evaluated the performance of ChatGPT 4 (24 May 2023 version) on official MRCP (Membership of the Royal College of Physicians) parts 1 and 2 written examination practice questions. Statistical analysis was performed using Python. Spearman rank correlation assessed the relationship between the probability of correctly answering a question and two variables: question difficulty and question length. Incorrectly answered questions were analysed further using a clinical reasoning framework to assess the errors made. SETTING: Online using ChatGPT web interface. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the score (percentage questions correct) in the MRCP postgraduate written examinations. Secondary outcomes were qualitative categorisation of errors using a clinical decision-making framework. RESULTS: ChatGPT achieved accuracy rates of 86.3% (part 1) and 70.3% (part 2). Weak but significant correlations were found between ChatGPT's accuracy and both just-passing rates in part 2 (r=0.34, p=0.0001) and question length in part 1 (r=-0.19, p=0.008). Eight types of error were identified, with the most frequent being factual errors, context errors and omission errors. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT performance greatly exceeded the passing mark for both exams. Multiple choice examinations provide a benchmark for LLM performance which is comparable to human demonstrations of knowledge, while also highlighting the errors LLMs make. Understanding the reasons behind ChatGPT's errors allows us to develop strategies to prevent them in medical devices that incorporate LLM technology.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.635 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.543 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.051 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.844 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.