Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Gemini versus ChatGPT: applications, performance, architecture, capabilities, and implementation
63
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
This research paper presents an in-depth comparative examination of Gemini and ChatGPT, two prominent conversational AI models, exploring their respective applications, performance metrics, architectural variances, and overall capabilities. As conversational AI becomes increasingly prevalent across industries, comprehending the nuances of these models becomes pivotal for effective deployment. The paper initiates by outlining the wide array of applications for both Gemini and ChatGPT, spanning industries such as customer service, construction, finance, education, healthcare, and entertainment. It analyzes how each model addresses specific use cases, emphasizing their flexibility and potential impact across different sectors. Following this, the study assesses the performance of Gemini and ChatGPT through both empirical benchmarks and real-world deployment scenarios. Key metrics, including response coherence, accuracy, latency, and scalability, are scrutinized to gauge the models' ability to generate contextually appropriate and coherent responses in conversational contexts. Moreover, the paper elucidates the architectural distinctions between Gemini and ChatGPT, covering variances in training methodologies, model architectures, and underlying technologies. Understanding these architectural nuances provides deeper insights into the computational mechanisms underpinning each model's performance. Lastly, the paper explores the capabilities of Gemini and ChatGPT in handling complex linguistic phenomena, deciphering user intents, and sustaining engaging dialogues over prolonged interactions. This discussion encompasses language generation, sentiment analysis, context retention, and ethical considerations, shedding light on the potential of these models to facilitate meaningful human-computer interactions. Through this thorough comparative analysis, the research contributes to the ongoing conversation surrounding conversational AI systems. It offers valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of Gemini and ChatGPT, empowering stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding their optimal utilization across diverse applications.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.