Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Data Set on Accuracy of Symptom Checker Apps in 2020
2
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
These two data sets present the accuracy of triage (disposition) and diagnostic advice of symptom checker apps sampled in 2020. The sample consists of 22 commonly used symptom checker apps, of which 14 also provide diagnostic advice. The apps were tested on 45 case vignettes, i.e. fictitious descriptions of patients. As not every app was able to appraise every vignette our study yielded a total of 796 unique triage evaluations and 520 unique diagnostic evaluations. The data sets are a supplement to the paper "Triage Accuracy of Symptom Checker Apps: A Five-year Follow-up Evaluation" (doi: 10.2196/31810). The was collected by Anna Dames as partial requirement for her MSc degree in Human Factors in the Department of Psychology and Ergonomics (IPA) at Technische Universität Berlin. The clinical vignettes were originally compiled and modified by Semigran et al. in 2015 (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3480), and further adapted by Hill et al. (2020) (doi: 10.5694/mja2.50600) and in the study these data sets are supplement to (doi: 10.2196/31810).
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.214 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.071 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.429 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.418 Zit.