OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 16.03.2026, 09:39

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Dataset related to the article "G-CSF for Extensive STEMI: Results From the STEM-AMI OUTCOME CMR Substudy"

2020·0 Zitationen·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Open Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

25

Autoren

2020

Jahr

Abstract

This record contains raw data related to the article "G-CSF for Extensive STEMI: Results From the STEM-AMI OUTCOME CMR Substudy". <em>Rationale: </em>In the exploratory Phase II STEM-AMI (Stem Cells Mobilization in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, we reported that early administration of G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), in patients with anterior ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention, had the potential to significantly attenuate LV adverse remodeling in the long-term. <em>Objective: </em>The STEM-AMI OUTCOME CMR (Stem Cells Mobilization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Outcome Cardiac Magnetic Resonance) Substudy was adequately powered to evaluate, in a population showing LV ejection fraction ≤45% after percutaneous coronary intervention for extensive ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, the effects of early administration of G-CSF in terms of LV remodeling and function, infarct size assessed by late gadolinium enhancement, and myocardial strain. <em>Methods and Results: </em>Within the Italian, multicenter, prospective, randomized, Phase III STEM-AMI OUTCOME trial, 161 ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients were enrolled in the CMR Substudy and assigned to standard of care (SOC) plus G-CSF or SOC alone. In 119 patients (61 G-CSF and 58 SOC, respectively), CMR was available at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Paired imaging data were independently analyzed by 2 blinded experts in a core CMR lab. The 2 groups were similar for clinical characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, and pharmacological treatment, except for a trend towards a larger infarct size and longer symptom-to-balloon time in G-CSF patients. ANCOVA showed that the improvement of LV ejection fraction from baseline to 6 months was 5.1% higher in G-CSF patients versus SOC (<em>P</em>=0.01); concurrently, there was a significant between-group difference of 6.7 mL/m2 in the change of indexed LV end-systolic volume in favor of G-CSF group (<em>P</em>=0.02). Indexed late gadolinium enhancement significantly decreased in G-CSF group only (<em>P</em>=0.04). Moreover, over time improvement of global longitudinal strain was 2.4% higher in G-CSF patients versus SOC (<em>P</em>=0.04). Global circumferential strain significantly improved in G-CSF group only (<em>P</em>=0.006). <em>Conclusions: </em>Early administration of G-CSF exerted a beneficial effect on top of SOC in patients with LV dysfunction after extensive ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction in terms of global systolic function, adverse remodeling, scar size, and myocardial strain.

Ähnliche Arbeiten