Yes, but who <i>wrote</i> the article?

Abstract

Confidence in medical research and medical publications is relatively low. 1 Concerns about research integrity include not just the quality of raw data, but also how these results are interpreted, organized, and presented.Concerns of this nature are not new.Plagiarism provides a relatively simple source of information but can be detected with software available on the Internet.More recently, generative artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, provides another source of information that may not require much effort by the writer.The use of this technology raises concerns about accuracy, authorship, accountability, and transparency, and many journals require authors to acknowledge its use. 2 A third approach to medical writing makes use of professional medical writers to draft the manuscripts.In all these situations, the researchers are less involved in the research, by either copying another's work or outsourcing the synthesis of their own work.Using professional medical writers is not the same as medical ghostwriting since the use of these writers is usually acknowledged in the articles, but concerns or doubts about how this affects manuscript integrity remain.

Ähnliche Arbeiten