Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating a Large Language Model’s Ability to Answer Clinicians’ Requests for Evidence Summaries
2
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Overall, the performance of a generative AI tool was promising. However, many included references could not be independently verified, and attempts were not made to assess whether any additional concepts introduced by aiChat were factually accurate. Thus, we envision this being the first of a series of investigations designed to further our understanding of how current and future versions of generative AI can be used and integrated into medical librarians' workflow.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.380 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.243 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.671 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.496 Zit.