Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Generative AI --- The End of Systematic Reviews in PhD Projects?
1
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
In this opinion piece, we question the efficacy of students conducting systematic reviews (SRs) at the very start of their PhDs, especially now that we are riding, or drowning in, the Generative AI wave. How would the ubiquitous availability of Generative AI tools shape PhD research and supervision, and how can we capitalize on such disruptions? We report our reflections about early-stage PhD research from 10+ PhD supervisions completed by Sinha, and a recently started PhD project with Zamani as the student. We conducted a systematic literature review following traditional methods for the first four months and then revisited the task using ChatGPT and other related tools. We opine that while SRs still have value for new students, Generative AI must be incorporated, with care, to significantly enhance student learning, reinvest time savings into other, often-ignored skills, and improve the quality (breadth and depth) of SRs.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.652 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.567 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.083 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.856 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.