Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community
84
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Since OpenAI released ChatGPT, the discussion on its usage in education has been conducted by students and teachers of every education level. Also, many studies have been performed on the tool’s possibilities and the threats related to its usage, such as incomplete or inaccurate information obtained or even plagiarism. Many universities worldwide have introduced specific regulations on ChatGPT usage in academic work. Furthermore, research on using ChatGPT by students and their attitudes towards it has appeared. However, a research gap exists in higher education teachers’ acceptance of AI solutions. The goal of this research was to explore the level of acceptance of the usage of ChatGPT by academics in Poland, as well as point out factors influencing their intention to use this tool. The study motivation was related to an ongoing academic discussion mainly focusing on the disadvantages of AI solutions used in scientific work and the willingness to fill the gap by showing teachers’ attitudes toward AI. The data was collected online by inviting academic teachers from Polish public universities to complete the prepared survey. The survey was prepared using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) model extended with Personal Innovativeness. It revealed the acceptance level of ChatGPT usage in Polish universities by teachers and researchers and the antecedents influencing willingness to use this technology in academic work. The paper contributes to the theory of AI usage by structuring the studies regarding ChatGPT application for teaching and research, and provides practical recommendations on ChatGPT adoption in the work of academics.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.260 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.116 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.493 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.438 Zit.