Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Compared to Histopathologic Examination in Assessment of Oral Cancer – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Screening and early detection of oral cancer have always proved to be a diagnostic dilemma and challenging for oral physicians. Artificial intelligence (AI) has lately emerged as a promising new tool in this area. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the accuracy of AI-based technology compared to gold standard routine histopathological examination in the diagnosis of oral cancer. The study was carried out using PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 1-1-2000 and 31-12-2022, searched using three databases (PubMed, DOAJ, and Google Scholar) were reviewed, and data extraction was conducted from selected eight studies by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was carried out among studies with similar outcomes. Pooled sensitivity of AI was found to be 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86). This value was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). However, heterogeneity (I 2 ) value was 92%, indicating high heterogeneity. Our review and meta-analysis indicated that AI was efficient in diagnosing oral malignant and premalignant lesions when compared to the gold standard, i.e. histopathological examination.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.102 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.468 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.