OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 16.03.2026, 01:24

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

ChatGPT Versus National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for Postgraduate (NEET PG)

2024·4 Zitationen·CureusOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

4

Zitationen

3

Autoren

2024

Jahr

Abstract

Introduction With both suspicion and excitement, artificial intelligence tools are being integrated into nearly every aspect of human existence, including medical sciences and medical education. The newest large language model (LLM) in the class of autoregressive language models is ChatGPT. While ChatGPT's potential to revolutionize clinical practice and medical education is under investigation, further research is necessary to understand its strengths and limitations in this field comprehensively. Methods Two hundred National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for Postgraduate 2023 questions were gathered from various public education websites and individually entered into Microsoft Bing (GPT-4 Version 2.2.1). Microsoft Bing Chatbot is currently the only platform incorporating all of GPT-4's multimodal features, including image recognition. The results were subsequently analyzed. Results Out of 200 questions, ChatGPT-4 answered 129 correctly. The most tested specialties were medicine (15%), obstetrics and gynecology (15%), general surgery (14%), and pathology (10%), respectively. Conclusion This study sheds light on how well the GPT-4 performs in addressing the NEET-PG entrance test. ChatGPT has potential as an adjunctive instrument within medical education and clinical settings. Its capacity to react intelligently and accurately in complicated clinical settings demonstrates its versatility.

Ähnliche Arbeiten