Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The role of ChatGPT in developing systematic literature searches: an evidence summary
12
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
This evidence summary explores the potential and limitations of using ChatGPT for developing systematic literature searches. A systematic search identified the current peer-reviewed and grey literature. Studies were selected according to eligibility criteria. Included studies were analysed and synthesised narratively, focusing on the strengths, limitations, and recommendations for using ChatGPT to assist with the systematic literature searching process. Current literature is mostly opinion-driven, and there is limited published literature originating from the library and information profession. At present, limitations outweigh the strengths of ChatGPT for systematic literature searching, caution should be exercised, and human oversight is essential. More research is required, and information specialists and librarians are in a prime position to develop guidelines and share examples of best practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.260 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.116 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.493 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.438 Zit.