Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT in Teaching-Learning and Research: A Systematic Review
4
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Based on the most recent available data, ChatGPT has amassed a substantial user base of approximately 180.5 million since its public release in November 2022. This widespread adoption has prompted concerns among educators regarding its seamless integration into teaching and learning processes. The capacity of ChatGPT to rapidly generate highly pertinent content has generated significant interest and discussions in the educational sphere especially at a higher level. Although a substantial body of research exists in this field, there is a notable gap in the literature regarding comprehensive review articles focusing on specific subtopics, such as the application of ChatGPT and its impact on higher-level teaching, learning and research. To date, no thorough examination has been conducted to synthesise and critically analyse the existing studies in this particular domain. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of research articles following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, utilising databases such as Scopus, IEEE Xplore and ScienceDirect. Among the 106 initially identified studies, only 25 articles met our inclusion criteria.The results presented shed light on how ChatGPT can prove effective in teaching, learning and research. The review also brought to light a lot of issues, such as plagiarism, manipulation, cheating and ChatGPT’s trustworthiness. Our findings also underscore the limitations in the use of ChatGPT and emphasise the ethical considerations involved. Furthermore, this review illuminates potential avenues for future studies and also presents a critical assessment, paving the way for improvements in the field.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.391 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.257 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.685 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.501 Zit.