Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Working Towards GenAI Literacy: Assessing First-Year Engineering Students’ Attitudes towards, Trust in, and Ethical Opinions of ChatGPT
1
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can be used by engineering students to improve their learning, but it also can be used in unethical or inappropriate ways that might reduce professional competence.This study investigated student opinions about ChatGPT, a popular GenAI tool, to determine a starting point for AI literacy instruction.Results revealed general positive attitudes towards GenAI, inflated trust of its outputs, and a wide variability of ethical opinions.Students with more experience using ChatGPT were more likely than students with little or no experience to think that using ChatGPT for engineering school and professional tasks is ethical.The prevalence of students using GenAI tools, along with their optimism in GenAI outputs, indicates that there is an immediate and pressing need for AI literacy instruction in first-year engineering programs.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.214 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.071 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.429 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.418 Zit.