Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How Trueness of Clinical Decision Support Systems Based on Machine Learning Is Assessed?
2
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The application of machine learning algorithms in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) holds great promise for advancing patient care, yet practical implementation faces significant evaluation challenges. Through a scoping review, we investigate the common definitions of ground truth to collect clinically relevant reference values, as well as the typical metrics and combinations employed for assessing trueness. Our analysis reveals that ground truth definition is mostly not in accordance with the standard ISO expectation and that used combination of metrics does not usually cover all aspects of CDSS trueness, particularly neglecting the negative class perspective.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.339 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.211 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.614 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.478 Zit.