Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can a large language model create acceptable dental board-style examination questions? A cross-sectional prospective study
9
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Background/purpose: Numerous studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) can score above the passing grade on various board examinations. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate national dental board-style examination questions created by an LLM versus those created by human experts using item analysis. Materials and methods: = 30) who participated voluntarily. An LLM, ChatGPT 4o, was used to generate 44 national dental board-style examination questions based on textbook content. Twenty questions for the LLM set were randomly selected after removing false questions. Two experts created another set of 20 questions based on the same content and in the same style as the LLM. Participating students simultaneously answered a total of 40 questions divided into two sets using Google Forms in the classroom. The responses were analyzed to assess difficulty, discrimination index, and distractor efficiency. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test or linear-by-linear association test, with a confidence level of 95%. Results: > 0.050). Conclusion: The LLM can create national board-style examination questions of equivalent quality to those created by human experts.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.697 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.602 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.127 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.872 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.