Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Human vs ChatGPT. È possibile ottenere risultati paragonabili nell’analisi di scientific systematic review?
3
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI), represented by ChatGPT, showed significant potential in revolutionizing the production of scientific literature by supporting healthcare professionals. Although there are challenges that require careful evaluation, ChatGPT's results are comparable to human results. The key element is not so much the superiority of AI over humans but the human ability to configure and direct AI for optimal or even potentially superior human results.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.287 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.140 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.534 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.450 Zit.