Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Assessing the Capability of Advanced AI Models in Cardiovascular Symptom Recognition: A Comparative Study
4
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The field of medical informatics has been significantly transformed in recent years with the emergence of Natural Language Understanding (NLU) and Large Language Models (LLM), providing new opportunities for innovative patient care solutions. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of publicly available LLMs as symptom checkers for cardiological diseases by comparing their diagnostic capabilities in real disease cases. We employed a set of 9 models, including ChatGPT-4, OpenSource models, Google PaLM 2, and Meta’s LLaMA, to assess their diagnostic accuracy, reliability, and safety across various clinical scenarios. Our methodology involved presenting these LLMs with symptom descriptions and test results in Spanish, requiring them to provide specialist diagnoses and recommendations in English. This approach allowed us to compare the performance of each model, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations in a healthcare context. The results revealed varying levels of accuracy, precision, and sensitivity among the models, demonstrating the potential of LLMs to enhance medical education and patient care. By analysing the capabilities of each model, our study contributes to a deeper understanding of artificial intelligence’s role in medical diagnosis. We argue for the strategic implementation of LLMs in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of balancing sensitivity and realism to optimize patient outcomes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.100 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.466 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.