Use of artificial intelligence in academic writing

Abstract

Dear Editor, We read with great interest the article titled “ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks” by Mondal et al.,[1] and the power of ChatGPT listed out is impressive. However, there are still concerns about using artificial intelligence (AI) scientifically. First, AI-powered large language models (LLM), including but not limited to GPT-3.5 or 4 or internet search function-equipped AI,[2] are trained on large datasets and may inadvertently reproduce biases present in those origins.[3] This could lead to the propagation of misinformation or biased viewpoints, which is a significant concern in academic writing. Second, the article emphasizes the importance of maintaining human judgment in the writing process, but does not sufficiently explore the potential for over-reliance on AI tools. The risk of unnoticed plagiarism through LLM outputs is also not adequately addressed. While Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) can generate human-like text, it does not have the ability to create original ideas or arguments, which are crucial in academic writing. The use of AI-generated content could blur the lines of authorship, which is one of the ethical considerations.[4] Lastly, the article concludes with recommendations for researchers and writers to ensure responsible and effective use of ChatGPT in academic writing. However, it would be beneficial to provide more concrete examples or case studies to illustrate these recommendations. Residents under training are especially vulnerable to temptations on assignment cheating with AI tools.[5] Postgraduate practitioners are also potential misusers of the AI technology for their continuing medical education multiple choice questions, or continuous professional development assignments. In conclusion, while Mondal et al.[1] provided valuable insights into the use of ChatGPT in academic writing, a more critical examination of the limitations and potential risks associated with AI-powered LLM would definitely be needed before its widespread application. Financial support and sponsorship: Nil. Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

Ähnliche Arbeiten