Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluation of the efficacy of ChatGPT versus medical students in clinical case resolution
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Introduction: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical education has gained relevance, and tools like ChatGPT offer support in solving clinical cases. This study compared the average performance of ChatGPT against medical students to evaluate its potential as an educational tool. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted with 110 sixth-semester medical students from the Technical University of Ambato. Four clinical cases were designed, covering cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, and neurology scenarios. Multiple-choice questions were used to assess both the participants and ChatGPT. Data were analyzed using the Student's t-test for independent samples. Results: ChatGPT outperformed the students in all cases, with an average score of 8.25 compared to 7.35 for the students. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.0293). Conclusions: ChatGPT demonstrated superior performance in solving clinical cases compared to medical students. However, limitations such as potential inaccuracies in information highlight the need for further studies and supervision when integrating AI into medical education.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.260 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.116 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.493 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.438 Zit.