Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Radiologists’ Views on the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology (ATRAI-14)
2
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
<b>Introduction</b>: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming an essential part of modern radiology. However, available evidence highlights issues in the real-world applicability of AI tools and mixed radiologists' acceptance. We aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate the attitude of radiologists toward radiology AI (ATRAI-14). <b>Materials and Methods</b>: We generated items based on the European Society of Radiology questionnaire. Item reduction yielded 23 items, 12 of which contribute to scoring. The items were allocated into four domains ("Familiarity", "Trust", "Implementation Perspective", and "Hopes and Fears") and a part related to the respondent's demographics and professional background. As a pre-test method, we conducted cognitive interviews with 20 radiologists. Pilot testing with reliability and validity assessment was carried out on a representative sample of 90 respondents. Construct validity was assessed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). <b>Results</b>: CFA confirmed the feasibility of four domains structure. ATRAI-14 demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha 0.78 95%CI [0.68, 0.83]), good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89, 95% CI [0.67, 0.96], <i>p</i>-value < 0.05), and acceptable criterion validity (Spearman's rho 0.73, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The questionnaire is useful for providing detailed AI acceptance measurements for making management decisions when implementing AI in radiology.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.287 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.140 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.534 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.450 Zit.