Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Learning to match patients to clinical trials using large language models
16
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for matching patients to clinical trials (CTs) within an information retrieval pipeline. Our objective is to enhance the process of patient-trial matching by leveraging the semantic processing capabilities of LLMs, thereby improving the effectiveness of patient recruitment for clinical trials. METHODS: We employed a multi-stage retrieval pipeline integrating various methodologies, including BM25 and Transformer-based rankers, along with LLM-based methods. Our primary datasets were the TREC Clinical Trials 2021-23 track collections. We compared LLM-based approaches, focusing on methods that leverage LLMs in query formulation, filtering, relevance ranking, and re-ranking of CTs. RESULTS: Our results indicate that LLM-based systems, particularly those involving re-ranking with a fine-tuned LLM, outperform traditional methods in terms of nDCG and Precision measures. The study demonstrates that fine-tuning LLMs enhances their ability to find eligible trials. Moreover, our LLM-based approach is competitive with state-of-the-art systems in the TREC challenges. The study shows the effectiveness of LLMs in CT matching, highlighting their potential in handling complex semantic analysis and improving patient-trial matching. However, the use of LLMs increases the computational cost and reduces efficiency. We provide a detailed analysis of effectiveness-efficiency trade-offs. CONCLUSION: This research demonstrates the promising role of LLMs in enhancing the patient-to-clinical trial matching process, offering a significant advancement in the automation of patient recruitment. Future work should explore optimising the balance between computational cost and retrieval effectiveness in practical applications.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.750 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.549 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.957 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.567 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.083 Zit.