Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Expert-Guided Large Language Models for Clinical Decision Support in Precision Oncology
39
Zitationen
19
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
PURPOSE: . METHODS: -indexed literature (draft system), MEREDITH was enhanced to incorporate clinical studies on drug response within the specific tumor type, trial databases, drug approval status, and oncologic guidelines. The MTB provided a benchmark with manually curated treatment recommendations and assessed the clinical relevance of LLM-generated options (qualitative assessment). We measured semantic cosine similarity between LLM suggestions and clinician responses (quantitative assessment). RESULTS: = .01). CONCLUSION: Expert feedback and domain-specific data augment LLM performance. Future research should investigate responsible LLM integration into real-world clinical workflows.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.560 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.451 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.948 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.797 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- German Cancer Research Center(DE)
- TUM Klinikum(DE)
- Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung(DE)
- Technical University of Munich(DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz(DE)
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz(DE)
- Heidelberg University(DE)
- University Hospital Heidelberg(DE)
- Fresenius (Germany)(DE)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases(DE)