Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Analysis of public perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in genomic medicine
4
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
PURPOSE: Next generation sequencing has led to the creation of large pools of genomic data with analysis rather than data generation now the limiting factor. Artificial intelligence (AI) may be required to optimize the benefits of these data, but little is known about how the public feels about the use of AI in genomics. METHODS: We conducted focus groups with members of the Australian public. Participants were recruited via social media advertisements. We explored potential uses of AI in genomic medicine, the benefits, risks, and the possible social implications of its use. RESULTS: Participants (n = 34) largely felt comfortable with AI analysing their own genomic data and generally agreed about its benefits. Concerns were raised over data security, the potential for misdiagnosis, and bias AI may perpetuate. Many participants wanted checking mechanisms for when results were generated using AI. CONCLUSIONS: The insights gained from these discussions help to understand public concerns around the use of AI in genomic medicine. Our findings can help to inform both policies around genomic AI and how to educate the public on its use.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.635 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.543 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.051 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.844 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.