Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The use of artificial intelligence based chat bots in ophthalmology triage
4
Zitationen
11
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Purpose To evaluate AI-based chat bots ability to accurately answer common patient’s questions in the field of ophthalmology. Methods An experienced ophthalmologist curated a set of 20 representative questions and responses were sought from two AI generative models: OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard (Gemini Pro). Eight expert ophthalmologists from different sub-specialties assessed each response, blinded to the source, and ranked them by three metrics—accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity, on a 1–5 scale. Results For accuracy, ChatGPT scored a median of 4.0, whereas Bard scored a median of 3.0. In terms of comprehensiveness, ChatGPT achieved a median score of 4.5, compared to Bard which scored a median of 3.0. Regarding clarity, ChatGPT maintained a higher score with a median of 5.0, compared to Bard’s median score of 4.0. All comparisons were statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Conclusion AI-based chat bots can provide relatively accurate and clear responses for addressing common ophthalmological inquiries. ChatGPT surpassed Bard in all measured metrics. While these AI models exhibit promise, further research is indicated to improve their performance and allow them to be used as a reliable medical tool.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.687 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.591 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.114 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.867 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.