Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
“Why Can’t I Use ChatGPT for My Academic Learning?” Voices from Ph.D. Students in a Thai University
1
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Amidst the integration of AI tools in education, ChatGPT is considered prevalent for its potential capacities. Although research into this phenomenon has been conducted by worldwide scholars, little has been known about the perceptions of Ph.D. students of non-English speaking countries. Hence, this qualitative study shifted the focus to this marginalized group of participants in a specific university in Thailand. Based on the constructivist worldview, the study featured interviews with four Ph.D. students. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings of the study uncovered a nuanced view of the use of ChatGPT in empowering academic advancement for Ph.D. students while the challenges are also significant, including the impacts on critical thinking, ethical issues, and specialized terms. The findings further advocated responsible ChatGPT use and called for institutional support in terms of academic integrity. This research design contributes a unique perspective to the discourse on using ChatGPT in education, emphasizing a contextualized experience and the needs of non-native English-speaking Ph.D. students in utilizing ChatGPT for academic purposes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.