Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Enhancing Scientific Rigor With Editorial Roles and AI
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of open-access scientific journals, the roles of editors and reviewers are crucial in ensuring quality and integrity. This chapter analyzes the experiences of two college professors—a cell biologist/biophysicist and a computer scientist—who, in addition to various fields of study, have edited and reviewed over 50 high-impact journal manuscripts related to digital health (DH) and precision/personalized medicine (PM). Their journey underscores the importance of multi-disciplinary approaches and artificial intelligence (AI) in evaluating complex research. The chapter highlights specific cases of DH and PM illustrating how digital solutions and AI have shaped their perspectives. Key elements of robust manuscript evaluation, such as methodological rigor and clinical relevance, are discussed. The chapter explores the emerging role of AI in enhancing the editorial process, from initial screening to detailed analysis. The findings advocate for active participation in peer review and editorial roles, emphasizing their benefits.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.200 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.051 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.416 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.410 Zit.