Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and BingAI in Answering the National Eligibility Entrance Test for Postgraduates (NEET-PG)-Style Practice Questions: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
2
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The study concludes that both ChatGPT and BingAI have the potential to serve as effective study aids for medical licensing exams. While both models showed competence in answering questions, BingAI consistently outperformed ChatGPT, suggesting its higher accuracy rates. Future improvements, including enhanced image interpretation, could further establish these large language models (LLMs) as valuable tools in both educational and clinical settings.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.260 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.116 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.493 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.438 Zit.