Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models in Dermatological Diagnosis and Comparison With Dermatology Specialists
3
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have expanded its applications in diagnostic support within dermatology, but its clinical accuracy requires ongoing evaluation. This study compared the diagnostic performance of three advanced AI models, ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro, with that of board-certified dermatologists, using a dataset of 30 cases encompassing a variety of dermatological conditions. The AI models demonstrated diagnostic accuracy comparable to, and sometimes exceeding, that of the specialists, particularly in rare and complex cases. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in accuracy rates between the AI models and dermatologists, indicating that AI may serve as a valuable supplementary diagnostic tool in dermatological practice. Limitations include a small sample size and potential selection bias. However, these findings underscore the progress in AI's diagnostic capabilities, supporting further validation with larger datasets and diverse clinical scenarios to confirm its practical utility.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.100 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.466 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.