Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How should we assess trustworthiness of randomized controlled trials?
3
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Readers of this journal will be well aware that many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have serious methodological flaws, which undermine the credibility of their results. In addition, it is increasingly recognized that some trials are afflicted by problems of a different nature; they contain false data or results, and some have been entirely fabricated. These problematic studies may describe sound methods [1], which means that they are not flagged by common critical appraisal frameworks, such as risk of bias (RoB) tools [2,3].
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.250 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.109 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.482 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.434 Zit.