Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Prediction of mortality by echocardiographic parameters: human vs. fully-automated AI-based analysis
0
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Background The use of artificial intelligence (AI) for echocardiography analysis has been rapidly advancing and integrating into clinical practice. AI applications have demonstrated good accuracy in validation models compared to human experts. It is unclear how fully automated echocardiographic measures correlate with clinical outcomes, as compare to human readers. Purpose We aim to compare the performance of AI-based vs human expert-based analysis of echocardiographic measurements in prediction of mortality. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 889 consecutive hospitalized patients who underwent a clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiographic study. Each study was performed by experienced cardiac sonographers and reviewed by expert echocardiologists. All studies were also analyzed by a commercial, fully automated AI software (Us2.AI). For both human and AI measurements, we constructed multivariable models to predict 1-year all-cause mortality. Variables included in the models were selected based on their significance in univariate analysis. Cut-offs values were identified using a decision tree and the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) algorithm. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine which model provided stronger predictive power for mortality. Results Of the 889 patients, 731 (82%) patients (mean age 68±16, 46% Female) had sufficient echocardiographic data to be included in the analysis. One-year mortality was 13% (95 patients). Table 1 shows univariate analysis of human and AI measurements for 1-year all-cause mortality. 15 parameters automatically obtained by the AI system were found to be correlated with mortality, while 9 parameters from the human-based analysis were significant. In the multivariable regression model for 1-year mortality (Figure 1), the AI model showed superior predictive value (ROC area under the curve =0.758 vs. 0.709, P=0.041). Conclusion In this cohort of hospitalized patients, fully automated AI-based echocardiographic analysis was superior to human expert analysis in prediction of 1-year mortality. Univariate analysis for mortality Multivariable regression model
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.496 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.386 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.848 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.562 Zit.