Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Postgraduate Students Perception of Using Chatgpt in Clinical Management and Research: A Qualitative Exploratory Study
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated how postgraduate residents see ChatGPT's function in clinical and research settings. METHODOLOGY May 1, 2024, to September 30, 2024, was the time frame for this research. Twelve postgraduate residents from three tertiary care institutions in Peshawar participated in a qualitative exploratory study. Semi-structured interviews were used to gather the data, and a thematic analysis was performed to determine the main topics.RESULTSWhile ChatGPT saved research time, study participants reported that it also generated issues with data privacy and information accuracy. Power users felt the instrument was easier to use, although there was a range of comfort levels. While its capabilities were promising, most participants worried that using AI to make clinical judgments was risky.CONCLUSIONChatGPT can be a helpful addition to research-based tasks, but like any other technology, it may be misused in clinical settings. This calls for better training and optimization standards, which must be addressed in our medical practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.