Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A systematic review on ChatGPT and libraries: benefits, challenges and way forward
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to collect evidence regarding the benefits, challenges and way forward regarding ChatGPT’s use in libraries through a systematic review of the literature on the topic. The review also sheds light on the country leading in publishing on ChatGPT and libraries. Design/methodology/approach The authors searched five databases, including Web of Science and Scopus, to collect and review the literature on the topic. The investigators consulted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guide for screening and selecting the reviewed research. The researchers identified 29 studies eligible for this review. All types of content except books (due to the difference in length between the two) were included in the paper. This study did not apply time limitations. Findings The researchers identified multiple benefits of ChatGPT for libraries, including collection development, cataloguing, fast access to information, metadata creation, reference and research support. This review highlighted challenges such as sharing irrelevant, incomplete information, incapability to answer, etc. and the way forward (developing expertise, readiness to accept change and overcoming institutional barriers) regarding ChatGPT’s usage in libraries. This study found that the USA was leading in producing research in the area. Practical implications This study contributes to the area’s literature and might be helpful for library professionals, researchers and educational and research organizations. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic review that collects and reviews the literature that shares benefits, challenges and ways forward for using ChatGPT in libraries.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.324 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.189 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.588 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.470 Zit.