Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Scoping review of deep learning research illuminates artificial intelligence chasm in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
11
Zitationen
18
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Clinical validation studies are important to translate artificial intelligence (AI) technology in healthcare but may be underperformed in Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery (OHNS). This scoping review examined deep learning publications in OHNS between 1996 and 2023. Searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases identified 3236 articles of which 444 met inclusion criteria. Publications increased exponentially from 2012-2022 across 48 countries and were most concentrated in otology and neurotology (28%), most targeted extending health care provider capabilities (56%), and most used image input data (55%) and convolutional neural network models (63%). Strikingly, nearly all studies (99.3%) were in silico, proof of concept early-stage studies. Three (0.7%) studies conducted offline validation and zero (0%) clinical validation, illuminating the "AI chasm" in OHNS. Recommendations to cross this chasm include focusing on low complexity and low risk tasks, adhering to reporting guidelines, and prioritizing clinical translation studies.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.316 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.177 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.575 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.468 Zit.