Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Clinical Trust in Data-Driven Decision Support Tools: Qualitative Interview Study
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Data-driven clinical decision support (CDSS) is increasingly available to healthcare practitioners (HCPs), yet little is known about their trust in such tools. Primary care and oncology practitioners were interviewed about their use of data-driven CDSS, understanding of development processes, and trustworthiness. Preliminary results show they find the tools useful for shared decision making with patients, but emphasise clinical judgement when interpreting recommendations. Understanding of development and evaluation is limited, but HCPs' wider expertise provides insight into key concepts. In future work, we will explore whether greater clinical involvement in CDSS development and evaluation enhances trustworthiness.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.287 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.140 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.534 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.450 Zit.