Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Perplexity AI's Challenge to the Hepatology Board Certification Exam
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
We evaluated Perplexity AI's performance on the Japanese Hepatology Board Certification Exam. Perplexity achieved a 75.2% overall accuracy rate on 105 questions, but performance varied across categories. Compared with human test-takers, Perplexity demonstrated lower accuracy on image-based (63.6% vs. 76.9%) and X2-type questions (71.4% vs. 77.1%), although the differences were statistically nonsignificant. Results suggest that Perplexity AI can mimic the knowledge of hepatology specialists but has limitations including potential gaps relating to recent research data, integration of clinical guidelines, and language comprehension. Although AIs remain promising for medical support, human ethics and expertise remain crucial. This first assessment of a generative AI's performance on the Hepatology Board Certification Exam indicates the potential for AI to enhance diagnostic accuracy and the quality of patient care in hepatology.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.