Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Registered report: Does repetition increase the credibility of AI-generated images?
1
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
In an era where digital imagery has become ubiquitous, the ease of creating fake or AI-generated images poses a critical challenge to credibility assessment. Repetition increases the credibility of written and verbal information. Does this credibility gain also apply to pictures? Participants were exposed to both genuine and AI-generated images, followed by a credibility assessment phase including repeated and new images. We found that participants judged repeated images as more credible than new images, regardless of whether those images were genuine or AI-generated. This repetition effect remained consistent across diverse image categories with low between-image variability. These findings highlight a potent mechanism for the spread of visual misinformation: Images repeatedly shared across social media platforms may gain unwarranted credibility through mere exposure, regardless of their authenticity. However, the precise cognitive mechanisms underlying the repetition effect for pictures-and whether they differ from those established for verbal information-remain important questions for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.260 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.116 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.493 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.438 Zit.