Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Deep learning classification models demonstrate high accuracy and clinical potential in radiograph interpretation in the arthroplasty clinical pathway: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
2
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose: Imaging is a cornerstone of the osteoarthritis (OA)-arthroplasty clinical pathway: the continuum of care that patients with OA undergo, from initial diagnosis through to arthroplasty and postoperative follow-up. With growing interest from the orthopaedic community, this meta-analysis broadly evaluates the performance of deep learning algorithms in interpreting radiographs and cross-sectional imaging in this pathway. The authors hypothesise that deep learning algorithms will have comparable performance to clinicians when interpreting radiographs, but not cross-sectional imaging, with negligible difference in diagnostic and prognostic tasks. Methods: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 1, 2012, and April 1, 2024, evaluating deep learning algorithms for diagnostic and prognostic tasks along the pathway. Eligible studies included those that used established diagnostic or surgical candidacy assessments as ground truth. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool, and pooled sensitivity and specificity were determined. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves assessed diagnostic performance. Results: The meta-analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) interpretation included 66 studies, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.92) and a pooled specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94). Sensitivity and specificity values were higher for AI interpretation of radiographs (55 studies) compared to cross-sectional imaging, with no significant difference in performance between diagnostic and prognostic tasks. For clinician interpretation, 11 studies showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.85) and a pooled specificity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.59-0.90). Conclusions: This meta-analysis highlights the potential of deep learning algorithms to improve efficiency in OA classification and prognosis in the arthroplasty pathway based on low-to-moderate quality evidence. Although the results are not generalisable, the findings suggest deep learning models have the potential to be adopted in OA treatment pathways, warranting further exploration of its role in patient care. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.644 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.550 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.061 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.850 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.