Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Eyes Don’t Lie: Indifferent to AI-Generated Depression Screenings
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This study explored how users respond to a depression self-diagnosis app with two outcomes: “doctor-generated” and “AI-generated.” The doctor-generated result was based on participants’ actual PHQ-9 depression scores, while the AI-generated result was randomly selected and sometimes matched the true diagnosis. Participants ( n = 47) with depressive symptoms used the app while pupil dilation was recorded using a Tobii Pro Spectrum eye tracker. Pupil dilation was analyzed before and during the decision phase. Participants who chose the doctor-generated result showed no difference in pupil dilation compared to those who chose AI. Our Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model predicted trust with an AUROC of 0.871. These findings show that users engage equally with both AI and doctor-labeled diagnoses, but pupil diameter is indicative of their trust.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.422 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.300 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.734 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.519 Zit.