Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Using ChatGPT in a Written Assignment
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Introduction: The availability and use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools is accelerating significantly. As these technologies proliferate, many post-secondary institutions have responded by banning students from using AI tools such as ChatGPT and framing the conversation as breaches of academic integrity. Background: Despite these institutional responses, many students adopt these tools as part of their learning journey. In health care settings, the adoption of such tools in the context of patient care provision is a reality. Consequently, there is a relevant pedagogical opportunity to examine how such tools inform the experiential learning of nursing students and their future practice. Methods: To address the dearth of information regarding nursing students’ perceptions of using AI tools, a Canadian university teaching team incorporated ChatGPT into an undergraduate nursing course assignment. A pilot quasi-experimental pre-post-test survey design was employed to examine student perceptions of using ChatGPT. After obtaining institutional ethics approval, a neutral third party collected the anonymous data. Findings: Pilot study results highlighted significant student concerns regarding the ethics of using AI tools. Additionally, students described such tools as meaningful avenues to support learning access and equity. Finally, students identified a high probability of use of AI tools in their future practice, suggesting that exposure and support during learning can positively influence responses to these tools in practice settings. Conclusion: The students surveyed are now practising nurses; thus, findings may provide insight into perceptions of new nurses regarding the integration of AI to support competencies required by the nurses of tomorrow.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.445 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.325 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.761 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.530 Zit.