Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Navigating a New Technological Landscape of Oncology: Patients’ Attitudes and Beliefs of Artificial Intelligence Use for Cancer Care Delivery (Preprint)
0
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being rapidly integrated into oncologic care, yet little is known about how patients perceive these applications. Understanding patient perceptions is critical to ensuring AI applications align with their needs and preferences. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to evaluate oncology patients’ attitudes and beliefs on the use of AI across clinical touchpoints in cancer care. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We conducted a cross-sectional survey study with adult oncology patients from September to December 2024. The survey assessed patients’ comfort with AI use across 8 clinical touchpoints of cancer care (e.g. screening, diagnosis, treatment) on a 5-point Likert scale (1=very uncomfortable to 5=very comfortable). Patients also rated their concerns about AI, including potential harms related to its use (e.g. medical errors, privacy breaches), on a 3-point Likert scale (1=not concerned to 3= very concerned). </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Of 383 patients approached, 330 (86.2% response rate) participated; 184 (55.9%) were male, 162 (49.4%) age 65 or older, 35 (10.8%) Black, 40 (12.1%) Hispanic or Latino, and 233 (72.6%) were actively receiving cancer treatment. Patients were most comfortable with AI use in cancer screening (80.2%), and supportive care applications, including exercise (78.2%), diet (74.8%), and herbs/supplements (72.4%). Patients were least comfortable with AI use to assist with diagnosis (70.4%), symptom management (67.5%), treatment planning (64.8%), and prognosis (61.5%). Nonetheless, about half (49.7%) were at least somewhat concerned with the use of AI in cancer care, most commonly loss of human interaction and medical errors. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> While the majority of oncology patients had a favorable view of AI in cancer care, nearly half had concerns about potential harms. Incorporating patient perspectives into AI development is essential for patient-centered and high-quality cancer care. </sec>
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.214 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.071 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.429 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.418 Zit.