Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT Vs. Humans in Generating Nursing Graduate Exam Multiple Choice Questions – International Perspective Study
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the quality of 100 multiple-choice questions (MCQs), 50 generated by ChatGPT and 50 by experienced human educators, for nursing graduate exams. A panel of 25 international nursing educators evaluated the questions based on domains such as cognitive level, scenario relevance, distractor plausibility, bias, inclusivity, and alignment with Bloom's taxonomy using a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all reflective; 5 = fully reflective). The MCQs generated by ChatGPT were evaluated as higher in relevance and cognitive level and lower in bias and inclusivity than those generated by humans.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.