Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Bias in AI: A Comparative Analysis of DeepSeek and ChatGPT
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Language models trained using artificial intelligence (AI) have now become ubiquitous in various fields, such as education, business, healthcare, and entertainment. However, these systems invite ethical questions, not the least of which is how to manage biases and maintain fairness. In this paper, two state-of-the-art AI language models are analyzed and compared: DeepSeek and ChatGPT. It examines how the ethical beliefs and practices of model developers seeking to mitigate bias influence the models' outputs and their real-world implications, using a literature review process. Through examining the strengths and limitations of each model in the context of ethical considerations, this study demonstrates key differences in how responses are generated, informative, and fair. Insights are presented in the context of responsible AI, including recommendations to improve governance and move toward a more equitable AI systems.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.239 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.095 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.463 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.428 Zit.