Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Using a Large Language Model (ChatGPT‐4o) to Assess the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medical Interventions: Interrater Agreement With Human Reviewers
1
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
ChatGPT appears to have some ability to assess RoB and is unlikely to be guessing or "hallucinating". The estimated agreement for "Overall RoB" is well above estimates of agreement reported for some human reviewers, but below the highest estimates. LLM-based systems for assessing RoB may be able to help streamline and improve evidence synthesis production.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.000 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.791 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.889 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.764 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.481 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health(NO)
- University of Saskatchewan(CA)
- Skåne University Hospital(SE)
- University of York(GB)
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences(NO)
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences(NO)
- University of Bristol(GB)
- Universidad Santo Tomás(CO)
- Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate(NO)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway(NO)